Services

Data platform builds

The foundation everything else stands on. Modern data stack implementations covering ingestion, warehouse, transformation and BI, built on your cloud and built to be owned by your team rather than rented from ours. Milestone-based delivery means you see working infrastructure early, not at the end.

Editorial illustration of a modern data stack from ingestion through warehouse to BI.

The process we optimise

The process we optimise: how data moves from source systems to the decisions you run on

A data platform exists to carry numbers from where they are created, your finance system, your CRM, your operational tools, to the reports and decisions the business actually acts on. When that path is reliable, every team argues from the same figures and the finance close, the board pack and the daily operational calls all agree. When it is not, people rebuild the same numbers by hand, disagree about which version is right, and slow every decision down. We optimise the whole path, not a single dashboard, so the platform becomes the foundation the rest of your analytics and AI work can stand on.

Before and after

What changes when the system is rebuilt

Before: the reporting nobody trusts

  • Reports are stitched together from manual exports pulled out of each system one at a time
  • Someone joins those exports together by hand in a spreadsheet, and the logic lives only in their head
  • One overloaded analyst is the single point of failure for anything the business wants to know
  • The same metric comes out differently in two departments, so meetings start by arguing about whose number is right

After: one platform the business shares

  • Data flows automatically from source systems into a warehouse on your own cloud
  • Transformations are written down, tested and version-controlled, so the definition of every metric is explicit and shared
  • Analysts across teams pull from the same modelled layer rather than rebuilding joins by hand
  • One agreed figure per metric, so the conversation moves from reconciling numbers to acting on them

How we think about it

We start from the objective, then work outwards

The same discipline runs through every engagement: understand what the process is for, then design the system to serve it and measure against it.

01

Start from what the reports and decisions need to say

We begin with the objective of the process, not the technology. We work out which decisions and reports the platform has to serve, who reads them, how often, and what each metric is supposed to mean. That gives us a short, ranked list of the outputs that matter and the definitions they depend on, which anchors every architecture choice that follows.

02

Map how data actually reaches those reports today

We trace the current path honestly, from source system to final report, including the manual exports, the spreadsheet joins and the undocumented logic that only one person knows. We name where numbers diverge between departments and why. This map is usually uncomfortable to look at, and it is the most useful artefact of the whole engagement, because you cannot fix a flow you have not made visible.

03

Design the platform around that workflow

We design ingestion, warehouse and transformation around how your data really moves and how your teams really work, not around a reference architecture. Metric definitions become code that is tested and reviewed. Where a manual step was load-bearing, we replace it with something automated and observable, on your cloud, structured so your analysts can extend it rather than depend on us.

04

Measure the platform against the objective we set

We check the finished platform against the outputs we ranked at the start. Do the reports the business runs on now come from one agreed source? Do the two departments that used to disagree now read the same figure? Does a new question take hours rather than days? We measure against the original objective, because a platform that is elegant but does not settle the numbers has not done its job.

An engagement, step by step

Representative walkthrough

The following is a representative twelve to twenty week arc, not an account of a specific client. It shows the shape a data platform build typically takes and the order the work tends to happen in.

  1. Weeks 1 to 5

    Source audit and objective-setting

    We catalogue the source systems, trace how numbers currently reach the key reports, and agree the ranked list of decisions and metrics the platform must serve. We architect the warehouse and ingestion approach on your cloud around those outputs.

  2. Weeks 5 to 10

    Ingestion and warehouse build

    We build the pipelines that pull data automatically from each source into the warehouse, replacing the manual exports. You see raw data landing reliably early, which is the first point at which the single overloaded export process stops being a bottleneck.

  3. Weeks 10 to 15

    Transformation and BI layer

    We turn the agreed metric definitions into a tested, version-controlled transformation layer, then build the semantic and BI layer on top so analysts query one modelled source. The figures that used to disagree between departments now resolve to one definition.

  4. Weeks 15 to 20

    Handover and platform ownership

    We hand the platform to your team with documentation, tests and the patterns they need to extend it. Ownership sits with your people, so the next new source or new report is something they add themselves rather than commission from us.

The engagement is judged on the objective set in week one: whether the reports the business runs on now come from one trusted source that your own team owns and extends.

What you get

  • Warehouse and ingestion build on your cloud
  • Tested, version-controlled transformation layer
  • BI and semantic layer your analysts can extend
  • Milestone-based delivery with working software early

How it typically runs

Typical engagement: 12 to 20 weeks, 2 to 3 engineers, milestone-based pricing.

1

Diagnose and architect

Weeks 1 to 5

2

Prototype

Weeks 5 to 10

3

Build to milestones

Weeks 10 to 15

4

Productionise and hand over

Weeks 15 to 20

Indicative timeline. Every project is scoped individually: book a discovery call and we will provide a detailed proposal within 48 hours.

Frequently asked questions

Do we have to move to a new cloud or rip out our existing tools?
No. We build on the cloud you already use and integrate with the source systems you already run. The aim is a platform your team owns and can extend, not a migration for its own sake.
Why milestone-based delivery rather than one big handover at the end?
Because you should see working infrastructure early rather than waiting months to find out whether it fits. Each milestone lands usable software, so the platform earns trust in stages and you can steer it before the build is complete.
What happens when the departments still disagree about a metric?
That disagreement is the work, not a distraction from it. We surface it during the mapping stage and force the definition to be agreed and written down as tested code, so the platform encodes one shared answer rather than papering over the split.

Ready to talk?

Get in touch. We will discuss your challenge and show you what is possible.